İKV Başkanı Ayhan Zeytinoğlu, AB liderlerine hitaben Doğu Akdeniz'de yaşanan gelişmelere ilişkin Türkiye'nin haklı tezlerini anlattığı ve AB’nin olumlu yönde adım atması çağrısında bulunduğu bir açık mektup kaleme aldı.

Söz konusu mektup, AB üyesi ülkelerin liderlerine, Dışişleri Bakanlarına, AB kurumlarının üst düzey yetkililerine ve üye ülkelerin AB daimi temsilciliklerine 1-2 Ekim 2020 tarihinde gerçekleşecek AB Liderler Zirvesi öncesinde gönderildi.

Hürriyet Daily News gazetesinde yayımlanan açık mektuba buradan, orijinal haline ise aşağıdan ulaşabilirsiniz.


Situation in the Eastern Mediterranean: A Call for the EU to take Positive Action

Open Letter to Leaders of EU Member States,

It is no secret that Turkey and EU relations are passing through a very difficult phase. Recent events in the Eastern Mediterranean attested to an escalation and growing tension between Turkey and two EU Member States.  The contested nature of territorial waters as well as lack of a mutually acceptable formula for the delineation of EEZs constituted the basis for tension and rivalry between the parties. The discovery of rich natural gas resources in the Eastern Mediterranean was expected to lead to coordination and cooperation among littoral countries in order to extract the resources and transport them to Europe. However, just the opposite happened and attempts to exclude Turkish Cypriots and Turkey from the exploitation of natural resources in the region backfired causing retaliatory action. While Greece aimed to ascertain its maritime boundaries through a deal with Egypt, Turkey declared a NAVTEX in the region for seismic research vessel Oruç Reis and a newer NAVTEX to hold shooting exercises until 11 September. Greece in the meantime passed a resolution extending its territorial waters to 12 nautical miles in the Ionian Sea. The Grand National Assembly of Turkey ruled in 1995 that Greece’s extension of its territorial waters in the Aegean would constitute casus belli. Hence, the situation is escalating to a dangerous point unless dialogue and reason takes precedence.

Dear Heads of State/Government,

You will debate relations with Turkey in the Special European Council on 24-25 September. From the remarks of the High Representative Mr. Borrell, I have gathered that restrictive measures and targeted sanctions against Turkey may be on the cards in this meeting. As a staunch supporter of Turkey’s EU accession process and advocate for its EU membership, I would advise against the adoption of further sanctions against Turkey. In fact I would call for a transformative action on the part of the European Council that would open a new era in Turkey-EU relations and in regional security.

The adoption of sanctions against Turkey, a candidate country and customs union partner, would be counterproductive and would only serve to create antagonism. More sanctions would not decrease the willingness of the Turkish government to fight against what it sees as unjust and unlawful attacks on its sovereign rights but on the contrary, it would increase the government’s resolve and determination. A second effect would be to further damage Turkey-EU relations and place one more nail in the coffin of Turkey’s prospect of EU membership.

As the representative of a Turkish NGO, I would like to strongly emphasize the point that the EU can and should play a very important role in de-escalating the situation and starting a process of resolution of disputes regarding territorial waters and maritime zones in the region. After all, while Greece and Greek Cypriot Administration are Member States of the EU, Turkey is a close ally, NATO member, candidate to join the EU and a customs union partner.

The EU is in a unique position to be equidistant to all parties and act as an honest broker. Putting pressure on one side and expecting Turkey to make concessions on the issue is neither fair nor effective. It only reminds me of the EU’s approach to the Cyprus question back in the early 2000s. The Helsinki European Council of 1999 noted that the EU supported UN-backed plans for the reunification of Cyprus; however a resolution of the dispute would not be a precondition for its membership to the EU. Afterwards while Turkey asserted its strong support for an UN-backed resolution of the Cyprus question and the Turkish Cypriots ratified the Annan Plan in a referendum, it was the Greek Cypriots who entered the EU without accepting the UN plan. Hence, by putting the onus of contributing to a solution of the Cyprus issue only on the Turkish side, the EU missed a valuable opportunity to solve the decades-long conflict.  

The Cyprus conflict continues to create a problem for regional security as well as the bilateral dispute between Greece and Turkey over territorial waters and maritime zones in the Aegean. The EU now has a second and precious opportunity to assume responsibility for the stability and security of wider Europe and take action for an equitable and just resolution of the issue. For this to happen, I would propose three important steps:

1-Engage with Turkey: Turkey is essential for European security and a key player in the regulation of many critical issues such as irregular migration and fight against terrorism. Relations are at a stalemate at the moment and even getting worse by the minute. Turkey had shown that it aimed to converge towards EU values, adopt the EU acquis and become a member of the EU by accepting candidacy in 1999 and working to fulfil the Copenhagen criteria. In parallel with the stumbling of Turkey’s accession process, Turkey experienced several problems in its internal governance coupled with geopolitical crises such as the Arab spring events. While the EU harshly criticized Turkey for moving away from Europe, it did not make an effort to draw Turkey closer. It is now time to act and engage with Turkey. Engagement could start with talks on the modernization of the Customs Union and continue with accession negotiations.

2-Support dialogue and talks between Greece and Turkey: The dispute over the Aegean can only be resolved through negotiations between Greece and Turkey. However in order for such a process to bear results, the EU should be equidistant to both parties and accept Turkey’s legitimate claims in the Aegean. A look at the map would make one instantly understand that Greece cannot extend its territorial waters to 12 nautical miles without infringing upon Turkey’s coastal waters. A solution which is suitable for the specific situation in the Aegean should be found and supported by the EU.

3-Support a solution of the Cyprus question: The EU until now has accepted only the Greek Cypriots as the legitimate representatives of Cyprus. The last attempt to find a solution failed in UN-sponsored talks in Crans Montana. It should be seen that under the present circumstances the Greek Cypriot Administration does not have any interest in finding a solution to the Cyprus problem and ending the isolation of Turkish Cypriots. The EU is in a unique position to call for a renewed attempt to bring the parties together for a lasting solution. The continuation of the frozen Cyprus conflict prevents regional dialogue and resolution of other international issues such as delimitation of EEZs and maritime boundaries.

Dear Leaders of the Member States of the EU,

As a representative of an NGO, I believe in the European future of Turkey and that you are Turkey’s friends and will act in the best interests of both the EU and Turkey.

Yours Sincerely,

Ayhan Zeytinoğlu, IKV Chairman


E-Bülten Kayıt


© 2024 İKV Bütün Hakları Saklıdır.
Designed By: OrBiT